Whistleblowers describe what they saw, not what law it breaks. AllegationIQ translates their words into the criminal, civil and policy violations at stake, the elements that must be proven, and a step-by-step plan to prove or disprove them — ending in a conclusion memo your General Counsel can stand behind.
“He takes the doctors to really expensive dinners and golf, and I heard he gives the office managers Visa gift cards ‘for their trouble.’ Our referral numbers from those offices went way up… I don’t want to get anyone in trouble.”
Compliance programs are built to receive concerns. The hard part is turning a feeling that “something isn’t right” into an investigation that answers the right legal question.
A complaint about “expensive dinners” may be a kickback case. A complaint about “weird billing” may be a false-claims case. The words rarely say so.
Without the elements of the violation, investigators collect everything and prove nothing — and interview the wrong people in the wrong order.
Regulators, auditors and courts judge the process as much as the result: preservation, privilege, neutrality, reporter protection, documented reasoning.
Every case follows the same disciplined path, so every investigator — new or seasoned — produces work the General Counsel can rely on.
Maps plain-language complaints to federal and Utah criminal and civil law and to company policy — ranked by how well the facts fit, with the reasoning shown.
Each theory becomes a checklist of elements. Evidence and interview notes attach to elements, so status is always visible: supported, refuted, open.
Who to interview and in what order — subject last — with open, non-leading questions tied to elements, and an Upjohn script when counsel directs.
The whole investigation on one page: phases, tasks, owners and target days, with progress as work is done.
Generates a privileged, element-by-element memorandum with root cause and proposed action items. Edit it, then export to Word.
A field guide for every violation type — red flags, evidence sources, specialists to call, interview question banks — plus guides on holds, privilege and retaliation.
| Element | Evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Remuneration | $14,860 meals & golf; $2,400 gift cards; $63,000 “marketing” payments | Supported |
| To induce referrals | Referrals +61% / +74% after events; text linking golf to referrals | Supported |
| Federal program business | 58% of referred claims billed to Medicare Advantage | Supported |
| Knowingly and willfully | Training completed; gift cards kept off the interaction log | Supported |
| No safe harbor | Awaiting contract review | Open |
AI speeds up the analysis. It never replaces the judgment — and it never invents the law.
Every statute and regulation in the library was checked against official sources. The AI can only cite from that library; anything else is flagged [VERIFY].
AllegationIQ proposes; investigators and counsel decide. Every suggestion is editable, and conclusions are always a person’s call.
Triage prompts the direction-of-counsel decision on day one. Memos carry the privilege legend. Upjohn scripts are one click away.
Plans never route through the subject’s chain, retaliation risk is flagged at intake, and closeout schedules a 90-day check.
Allegations are not findings. Plans test the innocent explanation as hard as the guilty one — and the memo shows it.
Every case follows the same method. See every open matter’s severity, stage and theories at a glance.
Elements, evidence, witnesses, questions and specialists — laid out the day the complaint arrives.
Privilege decisions made early, verified authority, element-by-element reasoning, and action items with owners.
The demo includes a fictional company with its own policy manual and six cases at different stages — from a raw hotline report you can analyze live to a fully worked investigation with a signed-off conclusion memo.
Access is by invitation. Please don’t enter real complaints, names or protected health information in the demo.